Skip to main content
EEffata
AI Governance Engineering PlatformNetskope implementation guidance available today

Turn AI governance decisions into deployment-ready security controls.

Effata helps security teams assess AI applications, define governance decisions, engineer vendor-ready DLP policies, prepare deployment plans, validate implementation and generate audit-supporting documentation — all through one guided workflow.

Built for CISOs, security architects, DLP teams and AI governance leaders.

AssessmentGovernance DecisionControl MatrixVendor PolicyDeployment PlanTest EvidenceDocumentation
ai-trust-center — sampleLive
GenAI ControlsAI Trust Center
Meridian Financial Group

AI Trust Center

Your organisation's AI intelligence hub - continuously evaluating applications, measuring trust, recommending governance decisions, and maintaining the trusted foundation for secure AI adoption.

179 applications catalogued · 176 fully evaluated · 3 awaiting evaluation

Search by name, vendor, or category
+ Add Filter
  • Adapta

    Adapta · AI Chatbots

    Discovery Only

    Trust Score

    3/100

    DLP Activities

    0/7

    Classification: Prohibited

  • ChatGPT

    OpenAI · General Purpose AI

    High Risk

    Trust Score

    65/100

    DLP Activities

    6/7

    Classification: Restricted / Unassessed

  • NotebookLM

    Google · AI Productivity

    Medium Risk

    Trust Score

    74/100

    DLP Activities

    6/7

    Classification: Restricted / Unassessed

  • Grok

    xAI · AI Assistant

    Critical Risk

    Trust Score

    22/100

    DLP Activities

    3/7

    Classification: Prohibited

  • Slack AI

    Salesforce · AI Collaboration Assistant

    Medium Risk

    Trust Score

    78/100

    DLP Activities

    7/7

    Classification: Restricted / Unassessed

  • Builder.io

    Builder.io · AI Productivity

    Critical Risk

    Trust Score

    42/100

    DLP Activities

    5/7

    Classification: Prohibited

View the full AI Trust Center sample →

The problem

AI governance often stops before the real work begins.

Your organisation may have an AI policy, an application inventory and a governance committee. But security teams are still expected to manually answer the difficult implementation questions.

  • Which AI applications should be approved, restricted or prohibited?
  • What data can be shared with each category?
  • Which controls should alert, coach, justify or block?
  • How should those decisions be implemented in Netskope or another security platform?
  • What objects, dependencies and policy order are required?
  • How will the implementation be tested and evidenced?
  • What documentation will architecture, risk and audit teams expect?

Governance is not complete until the controls can be implemented, validated and maintained.

The transformation

Complete the work that follows the governance decision.

Effata connects assessment, governance, control design, policy engineering, deployment and validation into one governed engineering lifecycle.

Before Effata
  • AI applications assessed in spreadsheets
  • Governance decisions spread across documents
  • DLP controls designed manually, case by case
  • Vendor configuration dependent on specialist knowledge
  • HLDs, LLDs and test plans written from scratch
  • Evidence gathered across disconnected tools
  • Every new application becomes another mini-consulting project
With Effata
  • One governed AI application register
  • Consistent application categorisation
  • Risk-based control decisions
  • Consultant-grade policy architecture
  • Vendor-specific implementation guidance
  • Structured deployment and testing plans
  • Continuous governance as applications and requirements change

Move from fragmented project work to a repeatable governance engineering capability.

How it works

From AI discovery to validated controls.

Seven steps that carry a decision from raw application risk to proven, documented enforcement — and back around as your AI estate changes.

01

Assess

Understand the applications entering your organisation

Outcome

A consistent foundation for application decisions.

02

Govern

Decide how each AI application should be used

Outcome

An approved AI application governance register.

03

Design

Define the controls that apply to each risk

Outcome

A defensible, risk-based control model.

04

Engineer

Convert governance into vendor-ready policy architecture

Outcome

A deployment-ready vendor policy pack.

05

Deploy

Give engineers a structured implementation plan

Outcome

A practical implementation guide for the security engineering team.

06

Validate

Prove that the controls work as intended

Outcome

Structured test results and implementation evidence.

07

Operate

Maintain governance as AI usage changes

Outcome

Continuous AI governance rather than a one-time project.

Deliverables

Every project produces implementation-ready deliverables.

Effata does not stop at recommendations. It produces the technical, governance and validation artifacts required to move the initiative forward.

Where Effata fits

More than AI discovery. More than policy documentation.

Effata combines the repeatability of software with the structured outcomes of a specialist consulting engagement.

Capability comparison between AI inventory tools, a traditional consulting project, and Effata
CapabilityAI inventory toolsTraditional consulting projectEffata
AI application visibilityYesSometimesYes
Application risk assessmentYesYesYes
Governance categorisationSometimesYesYes
Risk-based control designLimitedYesYes
Vendor-specific policy architectureRarelyYesYes
Required implementation objectsNot coveredYesYes
Deployment checklistNot coveredYesYes
Structured testing planNot coveredYesYes
Evidence reportingLimitedYesYes
Repeatable after the initial projectYesNew effortYes
Continuously reusableYesLimitedYes

Effata reduces the repetitive analysis, policy engineering and documentation work that consumes specialist consulting and internal engineering time.

Vendor support

Built for real-world security implementation.

Effata converts vendor-neutral AI governance and control decisions into implementation-ready recommendations for Netskope today.

Available now

Netskope

  • Prohibited AI application controls
  • Critical-data and secrets protection
  • Approved application policies
  • Conditionally approved application controls
  • Restricted and unassessed application fallbacks
  • Application-instance controls
  • Group-based entitlements
  • DLP profiles and notification requirements
  • Policy ordering and dependency plans
  • Testing and acceptance criteria

Effata produces reviewable policy guidance and required objects. It does not push configuration into your tenant.

Planned — not available today

Additional platforms

  • Microsoft Purview
  • Symantec DLP
  • Forcepoint
  • Additional DLP, CASB and SSE platforms

Introduced through vendor-specific implementation packs. No delivery date is committed here.

Who it's for

Designed for teams responsible for making AI governance real.

Security Leaders

Visibility into AI governance posture, implementation readiness, open risks and the decisions still waiting on someone.

Security Architects

Defensible control architectures with documented assumptions, dependencies, alternatives and limitations.

DLP and CASB Engineers

Governance decisions translated into policy structures, DLP profiles, configuration objects and testable controls.

AI Governance and Risk Teams

Application decisions, organisational scope, data-handling rules and evidence maintained across the governance lifecycle.

Consultants and Service Providers

Standardised delivery, less repetitive documentation, and consistent customer-facing artifacts across engagements.

Effata is best suited to organisations that

  • Have an active GenAI adoption or governance initiative
  • Operate a mature DLP, CASB or SSE programme
  • Need to translate governance into technical controls
  • Work in regulated or data-sensitive industries
  • Want a repeatable internal capability rather than isolated project work

Plans

Build a continuous governance capability — not another one-time project.

Plans are structured around the maturity and complexity of your AI governance programme, and are designed to produce actionable outcomes rather than feature access.

AI Governance Foundation

Starter

Everything needed to assess applications, define governance decisions and create a vendor-neutral AI control foundation.

AI Governance Engineering

Professional

Recommended

Everything required to move from governance decisions to vendor-ready policies, deployment planning, testing evidence and technical documentation.

Enterprise Governance Platform

Enterprise

A scalable governance engineering capability with advanced organisational scope, integrations, controls and enterprise support.

FAQ

Questions we hear often.

Do I need to provide production data?

No. Effata can work with governance inputs, app categories, risk families, and sanitized implementation context.

What vendors are supported?

Netskope is available now. Additional DLP, CASB and SSE platforms are planned and will be introduced through vendor-specific implementation packs.

Who is Effata for?

Security leaders, security architects, DLP and CASB engineers, AI governance and risk teams, and the consultants and service providers who deliver these programmes.

Can I trust the Netskope configuration steps Effata generates?

Configuration steps come from a structured, version-controlled implementation database — never generated freeform by AI. Claude is used only to explain and contextualise; when it's uncertain, it says so explicitly rather than guessing.

Is this a one-time project or something we use continuously?

Both. Most teams start with an initial engagement — assessment through deployment — then keep using Effata as apps, regulations, and the Netskope tenant change, so policies, evidence, and documentation stay current instead of going stale after the first rollout.

How long before we have usable policies, not just a report?

Governance decisions and a prioritised policy set are typically ready within the first working sessions. Deployment checklists, testing plans, and evidence reporting follow in the same engagement — you're not waiting on a separate phase to get something you can act on.

How do you keep GDPR and HIPAA mappings accurate?

Regulation mappings, article references, and fine exposure figures come from a maintained compliance database, not from AI generation. The database updates independently as guidance changes — accuracy is a data problem, not a chatbot problem.

How is our data isolated from other customers?

Every table in the platform is scoped to your organisation from day one and enforced with row-level security at the database layer, not just filtered in application code. Nothing you upload or generate is visible across organisations.

Do we need to hire a dedicated engineer to run this?

No. Effata is built for the DLP, CASB, or security architect you already have — it structures the decisions and generates the artifacts an experienced practitioner would otherwise build by hand. It doesn't require a new full-time role.

How does this compare to hiring a DLP consultant?

A consultant produces a point-in-time deliverable. Effata produces the same class of artifact — governance decisions, policy architecture, deployment plans, test evidence — as a repeatable output you can regenerate as your environment changes, without re-commissioning a new engagement each time.

Your AI governance programme should produce more than recommendations.

Turn application assessments, governance decisions and data-protection requirements into policies your engineers can implement, tests your teams can execute and documentation your stakeholders can review — explored through a guided, read-only review environment.